I believe that I showed my knowledge adequately. I provided context for my passage, and historical context for the novel. I also referenced the passage and other points of the novel.
Criterion B: 4/10
I only analysed one literary feature, but I think I did a good job explaining how it connects to the novel and also how it effects the reader.
Criterion C: 3/5
I feel that my organization was fair. I tried to connect each point I was making so that my analysis would flow better. I also made sure to refer to things I previously said in order to provide clarity.
Criterion D: 3/5
I believe my language was adequate. I didn't use as much subject specific vocabulary, but my vocabulary was focused and consistent.
Link to Practice: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5aHkj51XkZBTEJWcnZVT3RXZDA/view?usp=sharing
Passage:
Abbott:
ReplyDelete- Great context; like that you also brought it back to author's purpose
- Watch out that you don't spend too much time looking beyond the passage- everything needs to be focused on the passage
- Need evidence from the passage- HOW is he doing what you say he's doing?
- Spent too much time looking at the novel as a whole- this is a commentary/analysis of the passage, not of the novel
- Refer to evidence from the passage; analyze the HOW and EFFECT of that evidence...link it back to the thesis/end result
- Need conclusion